Bloomberg LP


Redesigning Portfolio Cash Flows

MY ROLE

  • Lead Product Designer

SCOPE

  • UX Research, interaction design, stakeholder alignment, build support

TIMELINE

  • 2 months

Bloomberg LP is a financial software company providing data and other services to financial institutions and investors.

The Portfolio & Risk Analytics product provides institutional portfolio managers transparency into their portfolio’s performance, characteristics, and risk so that they can make better decisions based on their portfolios’ goals.

Led the redesign of Bloomberg PORT’s cash flow experience during a large-scale enterprise migration initiative, helping modernize workflows while reducing migration friction for institutional portfolio management users.

OUTCOME

Strategic Impact

Product Impact

  • Reduced migration risk by validating the experience for a user cohort representing 20% of the product's user base.

  • Redesigned the portfolio cash flow workflow by simplifying navigation and interaction patterns, enabling portfolio managers to analyze cash flows more efficiently.

  • Validated the features that provided, or did not provide, value for users.

Strategy & Quality

  • Identified future opportunities through workflow analysis and instrumentation planning.

  • Aligned product and engineering teams around feature priorities based on migration timelines.

  • Supported implementation quality throughout build delivery.

DISCOVERY

Context, Problem and Goals

Context

Bloomberg’s Portfolio Risk & Analytics product was undergoing a major migration effort from a legacy platform to a consolidated enterprise solution.

The migration required balancing:

  • feature parity expectations

  • usability improvements

  • user adoption and cohort migration

Because institutional users relied heavily on existing workflows, minimizing migration resistance became critical to product success.

Problem

The existing cash flow experience contained workflow inefficiencies and usability issues that created friction for users analyzing portfolio liquidity and managing cash-related decisions.


A better experience was crucial for user migration, to avoid user resistance in migrating to the new product. We needed to understand and resolve existing pain points and identify opportunities to improve the current experience in order to speed up user migration.

Business Goal

Our goal was to create a better experience so that users can migrate to the new product with little effort. We needed to create a product that allowed clients to seamlessly transition their existing workflows to the new solution.

Before
After

Case Study

MY CONTRIBUTION

My Contribution

I led research and design efforts for the migration initiative, partnering closely with multiple product managers to understand both business priorities and operational user workflows.

My role focused on:

  • uncovering workflow inefficiencies

  • identifying migration risks

  • validating redesign opportunities

  • balancing feature parity with usability improvements

  • prioritizing immediate improvements versus longer-term opportunities

I also worked closely with engineering during implementation to ensure design quality and support future product instrumentation efforts.

RESEARCH & ANALYSIS

Discovery with Product

After discussing user needs with product, I documented the following motivations users have when using cash flows:

  • Determine whether they are above/below their mandated cash threshold, for example, when simulating trades

  • Make sure they have enough cash to pay for their liabilities

User flows to better understand and empathize with users.

I found there were some experience inefficiencies, noted with a light red background style. There were also some open workflow questions that needed clarity, marked in yellow sticky’s in the diagram.

Since this project was important for the product migration effort, I wanted to understand all use cases, painpoints and usability problems that may have been overlooked.

Understanding User Workflows

To better understand how institutional users analyzed and managed portfolio cash flows, I conducted contextual inquiry sessions and concept evaluations with portfolio managers, operations managers, and asset owners.

The research focused on:

  • how and when users monitored cash thresholds

  • what triggered deeper investigation into portfolio cash activity

  • workflow inefficiencies in the existing experience

  • opportunities to support adjacent workflows like trade simulation

Wireframes used for research study

Portfolio Cash Flows

Simulated Portfolio Position Changes

Simulated Portfolio Comparison

I interviewed

8 Total Users

5 portfolio managers

2 operations FI managers

1 asset owner

Key Findings and Insights

Contextual Inquiry: Insights

  • Important cash analysis configurations were difficult to access

  • Grid usability issues contributed to poor search capability for analysis

  • Navigation patterns lacked discoverability

Concept Validation: Insights

  • All participants gave positive feedback on the new layout of the screen which exposed the aggregate and holding level views together.

  • Five (out of 8) participants either did not find cash guardrails useful nor did not demonstrate confidence on how they might find it useful.

  • Five (out of 8) participants did not find the cash flow comparisons between the current and simulated portfolio useful for their workflow.

Affinity mapping exercise

Affinity Mapping exercise image to prioritize while synthesizing.

DESIGN

Prioritizing Migration Goals

Given the migration timelines and product goals, I helped prioritize improvements that would create the highest immediate impact while minimizing disruption to existing user workflows.


The redesign strategy focused on:

  • Improving cash flow usability 

  • Reducing interaction friction

  • Maintaining familiarity where no prior issues existed

  • Establishing good defaults on wakeup for first-time users

Research findings also informed which proposed features should be deprioritized for the MVP, helping the team avoid overcomplicating the migration experience.

A Quick Wins and Opportunities chart

We aligned on this Quick Wins list for the current migration build, and one for the opportunities that can be considered in future iterations.

DELIVERY

Final Designs

The redesigned experience streamlined cash flow analysis by improving visibility into both aggregate portfolio cash positions and underlying holdings-level data within the same workflow.

Key improvements included:

  • Integrated graph and holdings analysis

  • Improved information hierarchy

  • Accessible drill-down workflows

  • Simplified portfolio simulation interactions

  • Enhanced usability for anomaly detection and investigation in the grid

The solution maintained critical workflow continuity for migrating users while modernizing the overall experience.

OUTCOME

Strategic Impact

Product Impact

  • Reduced migration risk by validating the experience for a user cohort representing 20% of the product's user base.

  • Redesigned the portfolio cash flow workflow by simplifying navigation and interaction patterns, enabling portfolio managers to analyze cash flows more efficiently.

  • Validated the features that provided, or did not provide, value for users.

Strategy & Quality

  • Identified future opportunities through workflow analysis and instrumentation planning.

  • Aligned product and engineering teams around feature priorities based on migration timelines.

  • Supported implementation quality throughout build delivery.

REFLECTION

Reflection

This project reinforced the importance of balancing modernization with workflow continuity in enterprise migration efforts. Designing for institutional users required prioritization between immediate usability improvements and long-term product vision, while maintaining a careful dose of consideration for users’ current operational workflow.

Previous
Previous

ESG Portfolio Analysis Integration